<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354</id><updated>2011-04-21T19:03:14.890-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The Knowledge Problem</title><subtitle type='html'>Commentary on Economics, Information and Human Action</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>572</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106755914685668942</id><published>2003-10-30T18:12:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2003-10-30T18:12:25.976-06:00</updated><title type='text'>KNOWLEDGE PROBLEM HAS MOVED</title><summary type='text'>Please do come visit me at my new home, www.knowledgeproblem.com, and please spread the word and update your lists. See ya there!</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106755914685668942'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106755914685668942'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106755914685668942' title='KNOWLEDGE PROBLEM HAS MOVED'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106729296139561303</id><published>2003-10-27T16:16:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2003-10-27T16:16:00.853-06:00</updated><title type='text'>TWO MORE INTERESTING ECONOMICS BITS</title><summary type='text'>1. Public Choice: Politics Without Romance, an article by James Buchanan, the Nobel laureate public choice theorist, in Policy magazine.2. A very cool post Umair Haque on double moral hazard, risk, and the recording industry. Link courtesy of Carnival of the Capitalists.OK, now I'm going to go nurse my headache of disappointment with a cup of tea and a little Pride and Prejudice.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106729296139561303'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106729296139561303'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106729296139561303' title='TWO MORE INTERESTING ECONOMICS BITS'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106729085753313266</id><published>2003-10-27T15:40:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2003-10-27T15:49:31.920-06:00</updated><title type='text'>OTHER INTERESTING NEW BITS</title><summary type='text'>I am still feeling molto dolorosa, so have not much to say that sparkles with any wit or originality, but want to point out some good content on rent-seeking, a pet topic of mine for many, many reasons (hey, when you work on a regulated industry, rent seeking is a familiar bedfellow).Sunday's Carnival of the Capitalists includes a link to a post by Robert Prather on rent seeking by the states. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106729085753313266'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106729085753313266'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106729085753313266' title='OTHER INTERESTING NEW BITS'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106727329064935203</id><published>2003-10-27T10:48:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2003-10-27T10:48:09.700-06:00</updated><title type='text'>THIS AND THAT</title><summary type='text'>Been putting the final touches on some changes around here, as well as starting to grade midterms, and trying in vain to buy a house for the third time in two years.  So today is a very unhappy day. Sorry for the ether silence. Please note also the new email address listed here, which is a prelude to the upcoming unveiling of a new Knowledge Problem website ...One entertaining thing came my way</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106727329064935203'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106727329064935203'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106727329064935203' title='THIS AND THAT'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106691686450498176</id><published>2003-10-23T08:47:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-23T08:52:17.360-05:00</updated><title type='text'>WSJ ENERGY BILL ARTICLE</title><summary type='text'>Wednesday's Wall Street Journal had an interesting little article on Congressional progress on the energy bill (subscription required). Not surprisingly, ethanol is playing a large role in the horse trading:The big winner in last-minute wrangling over the 800-page measure, which is estimated to cost taxpayers about $18 billion in tax incentives, appears to be the ethanol industry. It has pushed</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106691686450498176'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106691686450498176'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106691686450498176' title='WSJ ENERGY BILL ARTICLE'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106653038874194380</id><published>2003-10-18T21:26:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-18T21:26:28.516-05:00</updated><title type='text'>TKP GOES OUT OF TOWN</title><summary type='text'>Will be out of town for a few days, attending the US Association of Energy Economics meetings in Mexico City and giving a paper. Don't know the wireless/hotel situation, so will have to be loosey-goosey about the postings. Back Wednesday.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106653038874194380'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106653038874194380'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106653038874194380' title='TKP GOES OUT OF TOWN'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106641020021309082</id><published>2003-10-17T12:03:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-17T12:03:20.313-05:00</updated><title type='text'>ENERGY BILL UPDATE</title><summary type='text'>Yesterday was a self-imposed deadline for Republican-led resolution of House-Senate conflicts over the impending energy bill. I'm shocked, shocked to say that they missed the deadline. Note the areas where they claim to have gotten agreement:The talks have been dominated by Republicans who have the votes to fashion the bill largely to their liking, despite Democratic objections. And on all but </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106641020021309082'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106641020021309082'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106641020021309082' title='ENERGY BILL UPDATE'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106622436393296558</id><published>2003-10-15T08:26:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-15T08:26:21.230-05:00</updated><title type='text'>MARGINAL REVOLUTION</title><summary type='text'>Tyler Cowen has been making some very interesting posts over at Marginal Revolution (Alex Tabarrok has too, but I'm not going to say anything about them here, now!). I particularly thank and curse him for the reference to this normblog greatest jazz albums poll (although with RIAA Radar, I am loathe to buy many of them that I don't already own!) and to AllMusic. Thanks, Tyler, thanks a lot ...</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106622436393296558'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106622436393296558'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106622436393296558' title='MARGINAL REVOLUTION'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106622271160844188</id><published>2003-10-15T07:58:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-15T08:06:03.963-05:00</updated><title type='text'>ANALYSES OF PROPOSED ENERGY PLANS FOR CALIFORNIA</title><summary type='text'>I have been pretty busy this week, with travel and teaching and writing (and agnozing over the Cubs). Some additional analysis of Governor-elect Schwarzenegger's energy plan for California,  following up on this post from last Wednesday, are Ken Silverstein's Utilipoint Issue Alert from Tuesday, and this LA Times story from Monday.UPDATE: And here's a Sacramento Bee article from Tuesday on the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106622271160844188'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106622271160844188'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106622271160844188' title='ANALYSES OF PROPOSED ENERGY PLANS FOR CALIFORNIA'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106622176490086983</id><published>2003-10-15T07:42:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-15T07:42:44.640-05:00</updated><title type='text'>HOW FRAGILE IT IS</title><summary type='text'>Boy, it's sure quiet around here today after last night's game ... I don't have much to say, other than fans with front row seats in parks with short outfield walls and a team in the NLCS should learn to keep their hands to themselves.I think Tony Pierce summed it up with his title "maybe now you understand" andi was a man who was about to put his head in a pillow and cry over a baseball game</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106622176490086983'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106622176490086983'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106622176490086983' title='HOW FRAGILE IT IS'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106583208982865002</id><published>2003-10-10T19:28:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-10T19:28:09.690-05:00</updated><title type='text'>TRANSMISSION CONSTRUCTION IN THE DELMARVA PENINSULA</title><summary type='text'>PJM reports new transmission construction on the Delmarva Peninsula. Delmarva is a notorious load pocket in Maryland/Virginia on the eastern shore, and has been struggling with increased demands for power and NIMBY concerns about building new generation and transmission. This report suggests that some compromise has been achieved, because there have been both generation and transmission projects </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106583208982865002'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106583208982865002'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106583208982865002' title='TRANSMISSION CONSTRUCTION IN THE DELMARVA PENINSULA'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106583131195939270</id><published>2003-10-10T19:15:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-10T19:15:11.950-05:00</updated><title type='text'>ENVIROSPIN WATCH</title><summary type='text'>Envirospin Watch is a thoughtful blog by Philip Stott, who is largely looking at how the UK media reports on climate change science and policy. It's quite informative and light on invective and emotion, which is all too prevalent in climate change discussions.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106583131195939270'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106583131195939270'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106583131195939270' title='ENVIROSPIN WATCH'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106583118247940900</id><published>2003-10-10T19:13:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-10T19:13:02.500-05:00</updated><title type='text'>LOWERING TARIFFS IS GOOD. PERIOD, FULL STOP.</title><summary type='text'>I noticed two interesting articles touching on international trade today. The first is Arvind Panagariya's Foreign Policy article coming out this month. He busts a bunch of myths and urban legends about the effects of trade and trade barriers (as well as providing evidence that supports truths):“Rich Countries Are More Protectionist Than Poor Ones” Not even close. On average, poor countries </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106583118247940900'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106583118247940900'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106583118247940900' title='LOWERING TARIFFS IS GOOD. PERIOD, FULL STOP.'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106583018020456251</id><published>2003-10-10T18:56:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-10T18:56:20.386-05:00</updated><title type='text'>EXPECTATIONS OF NUMBER PORTABILITY ARE STARTING TO HAVE EFFECTS</title><summary type='text'>The FCC issues guidelines on implementing number portabiilty starting November 24:The commission said companies should complete a phone-number switch between wireless carriers within 2 1/2 hours, a time already set as a goal by most major carriers. The FCC said the time period is not mandatory, but the commission would reconsider that if it received many consumer complaints about delays in </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106583018020456251'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106583018020456251'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106583018020456251' title='EXPECTATIONS OF NUMBER PORTABILITY ARE STARTING TO HAVE EFFECTS'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106582790168840216</id><published>2003-10-10T18:18:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-10T18:18:21.650-05:00</updated><title type='text'>RECORDING INDUSTRY UPDATE</title><summary type='text'>This Wired article from Wednesday points to an interesting case: a record label that enables sharing, lets you try before you buy, and splits the proceeds of sales 50/50 with artists from the get go. This label, Magnatune, has about 50 signed artists. Also interesting is that the artists retain rights to the songs; they can record them elsewhere, etc. The contractual rights are under a Creative </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106582790168840216'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106582790168840216'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106582790168840216' title='RECORDING INDUSTRY UPDATE'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106579233299961784</id><published>2003-10-10T08:25:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-10T08:25:32.900-05:00</updated><title type='text'>HOCKEY SEASON BEGINS</title><summary type='text'>So my beloved Pittsburgh Penguins start the hockey season tonight at home against the Los Angeles Kings. Mario Lemieux is on the roster, and it also looks like we're pretty deep with talent both young and experienced at center, so the team's fortunes won't hinge so dramatically on his health. Martin Straka continues, and continues to play well.It's a young team, but with veterans like Lemieux, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106579233299961784'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106579233299961784'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106579233299961784' title='HOCKEY SEASON BEGINS'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106565647370244021</id><published>2003-10-08T18:41:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-08T18:43:25.840-05:00</updated><title type='text'>GOVERNOR-ELECT SCHWAREZENEGGER'S ENERGY PLATFORM</title><summary type='text'>There are some planks in this platform that, if he can follow through and lead people with him, will unleash an amazing amount of creative energy and dynamism. From the Governor-Elect's website, all points follow the statement "as Governor I will":Encourage cost-effective conservation by increasing demand response to changing electricity markets. One of Governor Davis's great errors was his </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106565647370244021'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106565647370244021'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106565647370244021' title='GOVERNOR-ELECT SCHWAREZENEGGER&apos;S ENERGY PLATFORM'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106564267013522708</id><published>2003-10-08T14:51:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-08T14:53:48.823-05:00</updated><title type='text'>TYLER COWEN ON ENGEL AND GRANGER RECEIVING THE NOBEL</title><summary type='text'>Yeah, what he said. Co-integration, Granger causality, ARCH and GARCH models for estimation, all are things that I have used regularly. Congratulations to them both!</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106564267013522708'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106564267013522708'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106564267013522708' title='TYLER COWEN ON ENGEL AND GRANGER RECEIVING THE NOBEL'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106564225467749429</id><published>2003-10-08T14:44:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-08T14:44:14.346-05:00</updated><title type='text'>MULTIPLE USE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AND RIGHTS OF WAY</title><summary type='text'>Kudos to Craig Newmark for picking up on a story that I think is really, really important: running fiber optic cable through natural gas pipelines.The cable can be inserted into a tube placed inside existing underground gas lines serving homes and businesses by cutting "small incisions in the streets," Peevey said.Think about it: most of the industries on which we spend much of our regulatory</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106564225467749429'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106564225467749429'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106564225467749429' title='MULTIPLE USE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AND RIGHTS OF WAY'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106563406646074972</id><published>2003-10-08T12:27:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-08T12:27:46.293-05:00</updated><title type='text'>A NEW JOB, A NEW APPLIED ENERGY PROGRAM</title><summary type='text'>As of last Wednesday, I am now working with Nobel Prize winner Vernon Smith's Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science at George Mason University. I will be the Director of a new Applied Energy Research Program at ICES. Through this program we plan to expand the use of experimental economic research in the establishment and implementation of regulatory policy, particularly electricity </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106563406646074972'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106563406646074972'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106563406646074972' title='A NEW JOB, A NEW APPLIED ENERGY PROGRAM'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106556187809842736</id><published>2003-10-07T16:24:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-07T16:24:37.910-05:00</updated><title type='text'>ARNOLD KLING TO PAUL KRUGMAN</title><summary type='text'>While you are at TCS, do also read Arnold Kling's open letter to Paul Krugman. I find his distinction between consequence-based arguments and motive-based arguments very important and persuasive. I have always found motive-based arguments to be cheap, shoddy and unpersuasive, and as usual Arnold hits the nail on the head.What's also interesting is that his analysis helps explain my reaction to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106556187809842736'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106556187809842736'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106556187809842736' title='ARNOLD KLING TO PAUL KRUGMAN'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106556142953652688</id><published>2003-10-07T16:17:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-07T16:18:40.353-05:00</updated><title type='text'>GLENN REYNOLDS AND NEAL STEPHENSON</title><summary type='text'>Some time last week my husband came home from work with a gleeful grin, and with a flourish he whipped out Neal Stephenson's new book Quicksilver. I had known it was out for a week or so before (because I read Intapundit), and figured I'd get it for him for his birthday. Oh well ... I am also looking forward to reading the whole trilogy, because while I am not particularly a sci fi fan, I am a </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106556142953652688'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106556142953652688'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106556142953652688' title='GLENN REYNOLDS AND NEAL STEPHENSON'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106556079725816562</id><published>2003-10-07T16:06:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-07T16:06:37.330-05:00</updated><title type='text'>LOWI AND CREWS ON ELECTRICITY</title><summary type='text'>I am thrilled, absolutely thrilled, to find out from Tyler Cowen this morning that Al Lowi's and Clyde Wayne Crews's chapter on electricity is available online (and many thanks to Dan Klein for doing so). I recommend it to you all.This chapter is from Dan Klein's and Fred Foldvary's book, The Half-Life of Policy Rationales, which I recommend to you all as a good set of arguments for how </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106556079725816562'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106556079725816562'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106556079725816562' title='LOWI AND CREWS ON ELECTRICITY'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106544713278167028</id><published>2003-10-06T08:32:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-06T08:32:12.623-05:00</updated><title type='text'>CS MONITOR ON NATURAL GAS</title><summary type='text'>This Christian Science Monitor editorial from Thursday lays out the natural gas supply issues in the US very clearly. Note that it mentions that a new liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal in San Francisco has been voted down. Such votes will lead to the persistence of high, and volatile, natural gas prices into the future.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106544713278167028'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106544713278167028'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106544713278167028' title='CS MONITOR ON NATURAL GAS'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106544686318864665</id><published>2003-10-06T08:27:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-06T08:27:43.063-05:00</updated><title type='text'>ECONOMICS OF CLASSICAL MUSIC</title><summary type='text'>Tyler Cowen has a nice post on the economics of classical music. I think he's right, and that the success of classical music rests on philanthropist attention and on satellite radio. I also think that popular, charismatic, virtuoso performers will contribute to classical music's fate, by their presence or absence. Wynton Marsalis and Yo-Yo Ma are the type of attractive headliners that keep people</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106544686318864665'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106544686318864665'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106544686318864665' title='ECONOMICS OF CLASSICAL MUSIC'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106544635515940740</id><published>2003-10-06T08:19:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-06T08:20:12.880-05:00</updated><title type='text'>CUBS ARE GOIN' FISHIN'</title><summary type='text'>How exciting is this? Notwithstanding Eric Zorn's cranky bile saying that we should chill, the Cubs winning the NLDS is wonderful. This article gives some indication of how exhilirating the win is for fans old and young. Eric's wrong because this is the first time since 1945 that we have won a playoff series. The fact that the divisional seres did not exist until 1995 is irrelevant, and his </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106544635515940740'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106544635515940740'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106544635515940740' title='CUBS ARE GOIN&apos; FISHIN&apos;'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106511340520266012</id><published>2003-10-02T11:50:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-02T11:50:05.056-05:00</updated><title type='text'>WHILE WE'RE DISCUSSING IRAQI OIL ...</title><summary type='text'>This interesting Baltimore Sun commentary by David Quayat highlights some of the economic and social problems seen in history in countries that rely on oil for their economic strength. Given what we've seen, especially in Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, his cautions are worth serious consideration.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106511340520266012'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106511340520266012'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106511340520266012' title='WHILE WE&apos;RE DISCUSSING IRAQI OIL ...'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106511316182020199</id><published>2003-10-02T11:46:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-02T11:46:01.356-05:00</updated><title type='text'>MORE NEWSWEEK SPECIAL ON EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS</title><summary type='text'>Here's a more extensive set of links to the articles I mentioned below.An Experimental MindHaving shaken the ivory tower and reshaped big government, Vernon Smith'sideas are revolutionizing businessBy Rana ForooharGive All Iraqis a ShareAuctions of state wealth go back to Rome, but no one has ever done itfairly. Now there's a chance to get it right in IraqBy Vernon L. SmithA New '</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106511316182020199'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106511316182020199'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106511316182020199' title='MORE NEWSWEEK SPECIAL ON EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106501636942993616</id><published>2003-10-01T08:52:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-01T08:52:48.840-05:00</updated><title type='text'>BLAST!</title><summary type='text'>Didn't get tickets ... grrr. Oh well. But I wish there were some way that those of us who live in the neighborhood could have gotten first dibs.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106501636942993616'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106501636942993616'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106501636942993616' title='BLAST!'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106501467662340018</id><published>2003-10-01T08:24:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-01T08:24:36.440-05:00</updated><title type='text'>SENATOR DASCHLE AND ETHANOL</title><summary type='text'>This Blogcritics post from Monday raises some very important points about the political dynamics behind the ethanol mandate that is included in both the House and Senate versions of the energy bill. The ethanol mandate makes little environmental or economic sense, unless of course you are a corn farmer.I'll have more to say on this point soon ...</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106501467662340018'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106501467662340018'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106501467662340018' title='SENATOR DASCHLE AND ETHANOL'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106501434094523227</id><published>2003-10-01T08:19:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-01T08:19:00.833-05:00</updated><title type='text'>CUBS TICKETS</title><summary type='text'>Am waiting in the virtual waiting room for playoff tickets ...</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106501434094523227'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106501434094523227'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106501434094523227' title='CUBS TICKETS'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106501429281634340</id><published>2003-10-01T08:18:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-10-01T08:18:12.726-05:00</updated><title type='text'>NEUROECONOMICS, AN ARTICLE AND A BLOG</title><summary type='text'>Neuroeconomics is a growing field, and is starting to get some attention outside of academia. See, for example, this Financial Times article from Tuesday on neuroeconomics research. They start by discussing trust games, and why researchers want to dig more deeply into some of the results that have come from laboratory experiments.Prof [Vernon] Smith suggests that many people have formed a habit</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106501429281634340'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106501429281634340'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106501429281634340' title='NEUROECONOMICS, AN ARTICLE AND A BLOG'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106495373266121497</id><published>2003-09-30T15:28:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-30T15:28:52.450-05:00</updated><title type='text'>I AM ENJOYING THE NEW ADAM SMITH INSTITUTE BLOG</title><summary type='text'>The two most recent posts there are quite entertaining and pithy. First, in commenting on the tedium and general lack of editing in the LOTR films, Alex Singleton observesYet the Lord of the Rings films have netted lots of money. Bad films, making lots of money. Is this an example of market failure?Well, no. Because lots of people really like the movies. An important part of the free-market </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106495373266121497'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106495373266121497'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106495373266121497' title='I AM ENJOYING THE NEW ADAM SMITH INSTITUTE BLOG'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106495307960670229</id><published>2003-09-30T15:17:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-30T15:17:59.536-05:00</updated><title type='text'>ONE REASON WHY I LOVE TEACHING HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT ...</title><summary type='text'>Is reading David Hume. From his essay "Of the Jealousy of Trade," (1759):Nothing is more usual, among states which have made some advances in commerce, than to look on the progress of their neighbours with a suspicious eye, to consider all trading states as their rivals, and to suppose that it is impossible for any of them to flourish, but at their expence. In opposition to this narrow and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106495307960670229'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106495307960670229'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106495307960670229' title='ONE REASON WHY I LOVE TEACHING HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT ...'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106484144090379984</id><published>2003-09-29T08:17:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-29T08:17:20.896-05:00</updated><title type='text'>NEWSWEEK ARTICLE ON EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS</title><summary type='text'>This week Newsweek has an intelligent article on experimental economics and its value in application to real-world problems. It starts with a profile of Vernon Smith and the work he pioneered that won him the Nobel last year, and illustrates the origins of experimental research:Smith did not set out to bring down the establishment. Back in 1956, when he was a young professor at Purdue </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106484144090379984'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106484144090379984'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106484144090379984' title='NEWSWEEK ARTICLE ON EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106484061267526913</id><published>2003-09-29T08:03:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-29T08:03:32.796-05:00</updated><title type='text'>CUBS CLINCH!</title><summary type='text'>I spent the weekend at a beach house in Michigan with my husband and six close friends, one of whom is a die-hard Cubs fan. She couldn't even listen to the second game in the same room with the rest of us on Saturday, but instead sat outside and watched the lake. Thankfully we had a bottle of cheapie champagne in the house that had been intended for mimosas on Sunday morning, so we could </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106484061267526913'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106484061267526913'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106484061267526913' title='CUBS CLINCH!'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106459097085101635</id><published>2003-09-26T10:42:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-26T10:57:28.563-05:00</updated><title type='text'>CALLUM MCCARTHY ON THE LONDON BLACKOUT</title><summary type='text'>On Wednesday Tyler Cowen raised the following points about Callum McCarthy's Financial Times editorial on the London blackout:OK, the author is Callum McCarthy, chief energy regulator in the UK, and he presumably has a vested interest in defending the status quo. And I don't understand his convoluted take on overcapacity and price history, as I read McCarthy he is committed to both high and low</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106459097085101635'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106459097085101635'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106459097085101635' title='CALLUM MCCARTHY ON THE LONDON BLACKOUT'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106458759082948349</id><published>2003-09-26T09:46:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-26T09:46:30.523-05:00</updated><title type='text'>JONATHAN RAUCH: DOS AND DO-NOTS</title><summary type='text'>As with almost everything that Jonathan Rauch writes, including this recent Atlantic Monthly article on genetically modified food, this National Journal article on dos and do-nots instead of haves and have-nots is utterly insicisive and insightful. He does a nice job of summarizing research on poverty that has moved beyond the convictions of the early 1990s that any attempt at a behavioral </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106458759082948349'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106458759082948349'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106458759082948349' title='JONATHAN RAUCH: DOS AND DO-NOTS'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106458669684318679</id><published>2003-09-26T09:31:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-26T09:36:05.390-05:00</updated><title type='text'>BOTH HALVES OF A POWER SPORTS COUPLE EXCELLED LAST NIGHT</title><summary type='text'>We were sitting here last night, watching the USA-Nigeria game in the Women's World Cup, in which Mia Hamm played brilliantly:Mia Hamm’s team mates have come to expect big games from her. But Thursday night’s performance in the USA’s 5-0 win over Nigeria was out of the ordinary even for the world’s all-time leader in international goals.Meanwhile, Hamm's fiance Nomar Garciaparra hit a home </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106458669684318679'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106458669684318679'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106458669684318679' title='BOTH HALVES OF A POWER SPORTS COUPLE EXCELLED LAST NIGHT'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106452452957469283</id><published>2003-09-25T16:15:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-25T16:15:29.500-05:00</updated><title type='text'>VARIAN ON CALIFORNIA</title><summary type='text'>Hal Varian's Economic Scene column today is a very clear and succinct analysis of the dynamics underlying the current state of politics in California. His summary of the electricity crisis is pretty sound (although he does persist in calling what they did deregulation, which it was not). A highly recommended read.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106452452957469283'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106452452957469283'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106452452957469283' title='VARIAN ON CALIFORNIA'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106441663062849942</id><published>2003-09-24T10:17:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-24T10:17:10.610-05:00</updated><title type='text'>HOW 'BOUT THOSE CUBS?</title><summary type='text'>With five games to go in the season, the Cubs are in first place in the NL Central. Who'd a thunk it?Back in June, when we didn't fall prey to our usual "June swoon", people started saying things like "if we can just stay in the running until September, then we have an easier schedule than either Houston or St. Louis, so we can have an end-of-season surge". So far, that seems to be the case, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106441663062849942'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106441663062849942'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106441663062849942' title='HOW &apos;BOUT THOSE CUBS?'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106441611323381331</id><published>2003-09-24T10:08:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-24T10:08:33.290-05:00</updated><title type='text'>ADAM SMITH INSTITUTE BLOG</title><summary type='text'>For economics commentary from a British perspective, check out the new Adam Smith Institute blog (with thanks to William Sjostrom for the pointer).</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106441611323381331'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106441611323381331'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106441611323381331' title='ADAM SMITH INSTITUTE BLOG'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106441451172673116</id><published>2003-09-24T09:41:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-24T09:41:51.463-05:00</updated><title type='text'>CHICAGO FED LETTER: NATURAL GAS</title><summary type='text'>Rick Mattoon of the Chicago Fed and I are the author's of the Chicago Fed Letter, October issue, and the topic is natural gas policy and implications for the Upper Midwest region. Regular readers of TKP and Tech Central Station are familar with my analyses of natural gas policy, and this letter reiterates some of it and combines it with valuable insights from Rick on the regional implications of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106441451172673116'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106441451172673116'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106441451172673116' title='CHICAGO FED LETTER: NATURAL GAS'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106431956586102195</id><published>2003-09-23T07:19:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-23T07:19:25.830-05:00</updated><title type='text'>OIL AND WILDLIFE CAN COEXIST</title><summary type='text'>This BBC article describes a Shell oilfiled in Gabon where more wildlife congregates than in neighboring wildlife parks.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106431956586102195'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106431956586102195'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106431956586102195' title='OIL AND WILDLIFE CAN COEXIST'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106431800203452729</id><published>2003-09-23T06:53:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-24T09:42:53.603-05:00</updated><title type='text'>THE VILE, PERNICIOUS BROKEN WINDOW FALLACY</title><summary type='text'>Kudos to Kevin Brancato at Truck and Barter for his terse explanation of the broken window fallacy. I remember after the Mississippi River flooding in 1993, Bruce Babbitt saying something like "well at least the silver lining is that the destruction will create lots of work." I think I yelled loudly enough and long enough that my neighbors thought I had finally lost it. The broken window fallacy </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106431800203452729'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106431800203452729'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106431800203452729' title='THE VILE, PERNICIOUS BROKEN WINDOW FALLACY'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-10643174712630553</id><published>2003-09-23T06:44:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-23T06:44:30.920-05:00</updated><title type='text'>NEW SOURCE REVIEW</title><summary type='text'>At the Volokh Conspiracy, Juan non-Volokh has a good set of posts on the economic and political dynamics underlying criticisms of the recent New Source Review changes, which I discussed in this post.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/10643174712630553'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/10643174712630553'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#10643174712630553' title='NEW SOURCE REVIEW'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106431649495815456</id><published>2003-09-23T06:28:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-23T06:28:14.776-05:00</updated><title type='text'>HOW COOL ARE THESE?</title><summary type='text'>Future Pundit was full of all sorts of interesting news while I was gone, including this post on using bacteria to extract methane from coal (and a sidenote on carbon sequestration), and this post on new organic materials to make cheap solar panels. One remarkable thing to note in his discussion of the efficiency of energy generation from the panels is how low the numbers are for solar -- these </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106431649495815456'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106431649495815456'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106431649495815456' title='HOW COOL ARE THESE?'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106431514703192009</id><published>2003-09-23T06:05:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-23T06:08:01.636-05:00</updated><title type='text'>COOL THINGS ABOUT OUR TUSCANY VACATION</title><summary type='text'>10. Gorgeous weather -- dry, sunny, overnight temps in the 50s, daytime temps in the 70s and 80s.9. Gelato -- ate some every day. The best quality and flavor combo we found was at a place in Florence called Vivoli, where we got the cioccolatta ricca (rich chocolate) and crema d'arancia (orange cream). We also had a good zabalione gelato in Lucca, and good hazlenut gelato mixed with chocolate in</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106431514703192009'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106431514703192009'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106431514703192009' title='COOL THINGS ABOUT OUR TUSCANY VACATION'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106295315243682466</id><published>2003-09-07T11:45:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-07T11:45:52.506-05:00</updated><title type='text'>TKP TAKES A HOLIDAY</title><summary type='text'>The Knowledge Problem will be taking a two-week holiday, resuming on Sunday 21 September. I am headed to Budapest for a week to participate in the graduate student workshop of the Ronald Coase Institute and to present a paper at the annual conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics (ISNIE). After that, a week's holiday in Tuscany.I'll post occasionally as possible </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106295315243682466'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106295315243682466'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106295315243682466' title='TKP TAKES A HOLIDAY'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106295256510873969</id><published>2003-09-07T11:36:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-07T11:36:05.180-05:00</updated><title type='text'>POWER IN THE HANDS OF SHIPPERS</title><summary type='text'>My friend Jim Johnston is very knowledgeable about energy markets, and he had a commentary in the Chicago Sun-Times last week on how to improve grid reliability.Thus, we have a new pattern of generation and consumption that overlies the older locally oriented grid structure. It is a prescription for disaster that promises to persist unless we do something about it. In referring to the two </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106295256510873969'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106295256510873969'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106295256510873969' title='POWER IN THE HANDS OF SHIPPERS'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106293920452906924</id><published>2003-09-07T07:53:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-07T07:53:24.553-05:00</updated><title type='text'>NEW REASON STUDY: A DYNAMIC AND CONTESTABLE GRID</title><summary type='text'>The recent blackout in the Northeast and Midwest U.S. and Ontario have brought electricity transmission to the foreground of policy debates. In a new Reason study , Adrian Moore and I explore ways that technological change and innovative contracting practices create potential competition for the grid, or in other words, make the grid contestable. The executive summary of the study:The dramatic </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106293920452906924'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106293920452906924'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106293920452906924' title='NEW REASON STUDY: A DYNAMIC AND CONTESTABLE GRID'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106269184015508502</id><published>2003-09-04T11:10:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-04T11:10:40.323-05:00</updated><title type='text'>MORE GRID ARTICLES</title><summary type='text'>Here's a little grid roundup: a USA Today editorial from last week on the barriers facing transmission upgrades. Here's one they forgot: the tax treatment of the heavily depreciated asset base means that utilities have little incentive to sell their transmission assets to a more consolidated owner that could internalize a lot of these goofy and problematic transaction costs and incentives. The </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106269184015508502'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106269184015508502'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106269184015508502' title='MORE GRID ARTICLES'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106269095884629593</id><published>2003-09-04T10:55:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-04T10:55:58.736-05:00</updated><title type='text'>NEW BLOG ON THE BLOCK: MARGINAL REVOLUTION</title><summary type='text'>A lovely double entendre ... I encourage you all to check out Marginal Revolution, a new blog by George Mason University economists Tyler Cowen and Alex Tabarrok. Some of you may be familiar with Tyler from his research and his posting at The Volokh Conspiracy. Tyler and Alex are incredibly insightful and sure to be full of engaging and thought-provoking analyses.I am already indebted to Tyler </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106269095884629593'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106269095884629593'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106269095884629593' title='NEW BLOG ON THE BLOCK: MARGINAL REVOLUTION'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106268855735264107</id><published>2003-09-04T10:15:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-09-04T10:40:08.950-05:00</updated><title type='text'>YET ANOTHER FEDERAL INVESTIGATION OF GASOLINE PRICE SPIKES</title><summary type='text'>Okay, let's review. In the last two weeks of August we had1. a burst pipeline in Arizona2. six refineries out of service for up to a week because of the blackout3. an impending Labor Day holidaySo the increase in gasoline prices was the result of price gouging, right? At least that's the contention of many politicians, who are only too happy to spend our tax dollars on yet another federal </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106268855735264107'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106268855735264107'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106268855735264107' title='YET ANOTHER FEDERAL INVESTIGATION OF GASOLINE PRICE SPIKES'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106225578503373974</id><published>2003-08-30T10:03:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-30T10:03:05.003-05:00</updated><title type='text'>BUSTAMANTE'S PROPOSAL TO REGULATE GASOLINE AS A UTILITY</title><summary type='text'>Where to begin ...? With this Contra Costa Times article and this Sacramento Bee article.The political theater that is the California recall election is certain to elicit some very bad policy ideas from candidates, and the prize thus far goes to Cruz Bustamante.  On Thursday Bustamante advocated regulating the gasoline industry as a utility.  According to the Contra Costa Times, "Gas prices </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106225578503373974'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106225578503373974'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106225578503373974' title='BUSTAMANTE&apos;S PROPOSAL TO REGULATE GASOLINE AS A UTILITY'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106217218762927655</id><published>2003-08-29T10:49:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-29T10:55:25.713-05:00</updated><title type='text'>NEW SOURCE REVIEW</title><summary type='text'>Few environmental policies and response to them are as caricatured as new source review. Earlier this week the EPA finalized the changes to new source review that it proposed in December 2002. Basically, this ruling clarifies what kinds of equipment replacement will and will not trigger new source review, and it allows firms (typically power plants, refiners, etc.) certain equipment replacements </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106217218762927655'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106217218762927655'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106217218762927655' title='NEW SOURCE REVIEW'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106216143813589517</id><published>2003-08-29T07:50:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-29T07:54:21.153-05:00</updated><title type='text'>LONDON BLACKOUT</title><summary type='text'>Okay, another one ... but at least this one lasted only an hour, and was probably due to a transformer failure in south London, according to this Financial Times article. Not being an engineer, I don't know if the recent, sustained strains from the heat wave has weakened any part of the transformers on the system ... I do recall in 1998, when during a hot Chicago summer ComEd customers suffered </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106216143813589517'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106216143813589517'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106216143813589517' title='LONDON BLACKOUT'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106199540411382504</id><published>2003-08-27T09:43:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-27T09:43:24.070-05:00</updated><title type='text'>ADAPTATION AND RIGIDITY?</title><summary type='text'>I've got to spend the day preparing my fall classes, so I am happy to have a guest post from my knowledgeable friend and colleague Mike Giberson. Mike wrote in response to my claims yesterday that the grid we've got is rigid and maladaptive. I was insufficiently clear: the regulatory treatment of transmission has made it maladaptive to changes in other parts of the supply chain. Here are Mike's </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106199540411382504'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106199540411382504'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106199540411382504' title='ADAPTATION AND RIGIDITY?'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106191125732387328</id><published>2003-08-26T10:20:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-26T10:20:57.406-05:00</updated><title type='text'>GAS PRICES JUMP</title><summary type='text'>No surprise there: blackout took 7 refineries offline for a few days, there was a big pipeline rupture in Arizona, it's coming up on Labor Day weekend ... Here are some links to articles discussing the gas price spike, from the Los Angeles Times (registration required), CNN/Money, and the Associated Press. I agree with Stephen Karlson's assessment of gasoline prices:When you see unleaded </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106191125732387328'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106191125732387328'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106191125732387328' title='GAS PRICES JUMP'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106191056741687405</id><published>2003-08-26T10:09:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-26T10:11:57.073-05:00</updated><title type='text'>GETTING BY WITHOUT THE GRID</title><summary type='text'>The blackout has raised public interest in distributed generation (DG). DG technologies have gotten more cost effective over the past decade, and many businesses that cannot afford power outages use DG for backup. See, for example, this Time article on net metering, which is allowing your meter to run backwards and thus sell power back to your local utility at the same price you get charged for </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106191056741687405'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106191056741687405'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106191056741687405' title='GETTING BY WITHOUT THE GRID'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106190813760389014</id><published>2003-08-26T09:28:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-26T09:31:35.826-05:00</updated><title type='text'>THE ORGANIC NETWORK IS ROBUST AND ADAPTIVE</title><summary type='text'>Paul Phlip at Long Harvest notes an oped in the NYT on the electric grid by Steve Stogratz. Stogratz makes some really important points in his argument, including the fact that we should think about the grid in a more organic and less mechanistic way, and that we should abandon the unrealistic idea about total control and perfectibility.We need to stop pretending that the grid is ever going to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106190813760389014'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106190813760389014'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106190813760389014' title='THE ORGANIC NETWORK IS ROBUST AND ADAPTIVE'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106190756520573281</id><published>2003-08-26T09:19:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-26T09:20:03.486-05:00</updated><title type='text'>WIND POWER IN ILLINOIS</title><summary type='text'>Here's an article from today's Tribune on wind power in Illinois. Wind power is too intermittent to be totally reliable in the absence of a better storage technology than we currently possess, but it may take strain off of the grid (especially if it's a hot, late afternoon wind ...). Wind power also receives government tax subsidies, thought to be necessary because wind (and solar) power are more</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106190756520573281'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106190756520573281'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106190756520573281' title='WIND POWER IN ILLINOIS'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106156746697867892</id><published>2003-08-22T10:51:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-22T10:51:06.926-05:00</updated><title type='text'>THE GREEN MARKET REVISITED</title><summary type='text'>Now is a propitious time to remind folks of a Tech Central Station article of mine from August 2002 on how market-based retail electricity pricing is good for consumers and good for the environment:One of dynamic pricing's most enticing long-run benefits is that it induces conservation. If it's expensive to produce electricity in a peak hour and consumers face that price difference across a day</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106156746697867892'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106156746697867892'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106156746697867892' title='THE GREEN MARKET REVISITED'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106156709341566495</id><published>2003-08-22T10:44:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-22T10:44:53.353-05:00</updated><title type='text'>SOME MORE TECHIE LINKS ON POWER SYSTEMS</title><summary type='text'>Here are some analyses of the more technical aspects of power systems: Peter Kaminski on who pays for reliability, Sparkey's outstanding post at Sgt. Stryker, Steven DenBeste, in a second post to follow up, and Shots Across the Bow.Very helpful detail for the supply and infrastructure sides of the issues.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106156709341566495'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106156709341566495'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106156709341566495' title='SOME MORE TECHIE LINKS ON POWER SYSTEMS'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106156659367799665</id><published>2003-08-22T10:36:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-22T11:22:30.560-05:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Any day is a good one when I channel Tyler Cowen, who points us to an article in the Washington Post on decentralized power. This New York Times article from last week about Hen Island points out many of the same strategies for removing yourself from grid reliance. Technological change in generators and in solar panels have made such redundancy affordable and, as I argue in this article on the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106156659367799665'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106156659367799665'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106156659367799665' title=''/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106156542690403026</id><published>2003-08-22T10:17:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-22T10:17:06.986-05:00</updated><title type='text'>SMITH-KIESLING WSJ OPED AVAILABLE AT REASON</title><summary type='text'>The retail electricity deregulation oped that Vernon Smith and I wrote on Wednesday is available at the Reason website.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106156542690403026'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106156542690403026'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106156542690403026' title='SMITH-KIESLING WSJ OPED AVAILABLE AT REASON'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106156452298319018</id><published>2003-08-22T10:02:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-22T10:02:02.910-05:00</updated><title type='text'>COST ESTIMATES FOR UPGRADING POWER LINES</title><summary type='text'>This table from the Energy Information Administration at the DOE indicates some estimates of the cost per mile of constructing different types of power lines:60 kv, wood pole:                  $120,000-130,000230 kv, steel pole, double:    $230,000-550,000230 kv underground:             $3,700,000Yes, that's 3.7 million for a single high voltage wire, per mile. And that was in 1995 dollars.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106156452298319018'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106156452298319018'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106156452298319018' title='COST ESTIMATES FOR UPGRADING POWER LINES'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106139470393999608</id><published>2003-08-20T10:51:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-20T10:53:01.820-05:00</updated><title type='text'>METERING COSTS AND DEMAND RESPONSE</title><summary type='text'>Chris King at eMeter sends me the following information as a follo-up to Vernon's and my oped today:Re your editorial, the equipment cost hierarchy you presented is debatable. Regarding load control, the expense is higher than implementing advanced metering, since the device cost is about the same (around $50), but installation is much more complex. A meter is a simple "unplug the old, plug in </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106139470393999608'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106139470393999608'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106139470393999608' title='METERING COSTS AND DEMAND RESPONSE'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106139444937177627</id><published>2003-08-20T10:47:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-20T10:47:29.440-05:00</updated><title type='text'>MY CONVERSATION WITH DON LUSKIN ABOUT ELECTRICITY</title><summary type='text'>Yesterday I had a lovely conversation with Don Luskin while he was working on his National Review Online column and his blog post on Paul Krugman's silly column on the blackout. It was a delightful chat about deregulation, the benefits of being more interconnected, and the value creation that comes through markets. Don said it more succintly than I have been able to:What she means is that, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106139444937177627'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106139444937177627'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106139444937177627' title='MY CONVERSATION WITH DON LUSKIN ABOUT ELECTRICITY'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106139193493679598</id><published>2003-08-20T10:05:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-20T10:05:34.990-05:00</updated><title type='text'>VOLATILITY AND ELECTRICITY TRADING</title><summary type='text'>This New York Times article suggests that sharp wholesale electricity price spikes last Friday dissipated quickly, and did not result in a lot of profits for the traders.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106139193493679598'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106139193493679598'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106139193493679598' title='VOLATILITY AND ELECTRICITY TRADING'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106138479496206453</id><published>2003-08-20T08:06:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-20T08:06:35.033-05:00</updated><title type='text'>ACTIVE RETAIL DEMAND RESPONSE CAN REDUCE POWER LINE CONSTRUCTION</title><summary type='text'>NIMBY concerns threaten to stymie attempts to build more power lines, which is one reason why we should enable customer retail demand response as a tool to empower consumers and to stabilize the grid.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106138479496206453'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106138479496206453'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106138479496206453' title='ACTIVE RETAIL DEMAND RESPONSE CAN REDUCE POWER LINE CONSTRUCTION'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106138257564532746</id><published>2003-08-20T07:29:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-20T07:29:35.630-05:00</updated><title type='text'>SMITH AND KIESLING IN THE WALL STREET JOURNAL</title><summary type='text'>Vernon Smith and I have a commentary in today's Wall Street Journal (subscription required).A systematic rethinking of the power demand and supply system -- not just transmissions lines -- is required to bring the energy industry into the contemporary age. Eighty-five years of regulatory efforts have focused exclusively on supply -- leaving on dusty shelves proposals to empower consumer demand</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106138257564532746'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106138257564532746'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106138257564532746' title='SMITH AND KIESLING IN THE WALL STREET JOURNAL'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106130450595760748</id><published>2003-08-19T09:48:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-19T09:48:25.883-05:00</updated><title type='text'>INFORMATION IS POWER</title><summary type='text'>This Chicago Tribune article provides an example of how technology and intelligent monitoring can empower customers to use less energy, just by being informed about your actual consumption, which is a capability that the standard watt meter does not possess.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106130450595760748'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106130450595760748'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106130450595760748' title='INFORMATION IS POWER'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106130428579716594</id><published>2003-08-19T09:44:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-19T09:44:45.723-05:00</updated><title type='text'>MORE ON ENERGY BILL OBSTACLES</title><summary type='text'>Here are a couple more articles on the obstacles facing a national energy policy: this New York Times article on how the nation's governors have difficulty speaking with a unified voice on energy matters, and this New York Times article on the difficulties Congress faces in separating out an electricity bill from the large omnibus energy bill proposals.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106130428579716594'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106130428579716594'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106130428579716594' title='MORE ON ENERGY BILL OBSTACLES'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106130133640986241</id><published>2003-08-19T08:55:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-19T08:55:36.286-05:00</updated><title type='text'>ONLY CONNECT</title><summary type='text'>The blackout last Thursday has produced some hyperbolic hysteria about the perils and vulnerability that come with being so interconnected. But decentralized interconnection is also a source of stability and growth, both physically and economically. Albert-Laszlo Barabasi, a physicist and author of Linked FINISH, had an oped in Saturday's New York Times about the pros and cons of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106130133640986241'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106130133640986241'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106130133640986241' title='ONLY CONNECT'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106124734446163998</id><published>2003-08-18T17:55:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-18T17:55:44.346-05:00</updated><title type='text'>CHECK OUT FUTURE PUNDIT'S POST ON NUCLEAR POWER</title><summary type='text'>Randall Parker has a nice post on nuclear power, citing a NYT oped and a study by two MIT professors. They claim that nuclear will become an economical alternative if regulation of carbon dioxide proceeds. Very interesting analysis.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106124734446163998'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106124734446163998'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106124734446163998' title='CHECK OUT FUTURE PUNDIT&apos;S POST ON NUCLEAR POWER'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106124661024749904</id><published>2003-08-18T17:43:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-18T17:43:30.203-05:00</updated><title type='text'>TIME TO RETHINK THE NATURAL MONOPOLY THEORY OF REGULATION</title><summary type='text'>I have a Reason commentary on natural monopoly theory. Excerpt:Many technological and market innovations have reduced the natural monopoly rationale for traditional electric industry regulation. For example, consider distributed generation. Distributed generation (DG) is the use of an energy source (gas turbines, gas engines, fuel cells, for example) to generate electricity close to where it </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106124661024749904'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106124661024749904'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106124661024749904' title='TIME TO RETHINK THE NATURAL MONOPOLY THEORY OF REGULATION'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106124627505887268</id><published>2003-08-18T17:37:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-18T17:37:55.010-05:00</updated><title type='text'>GOOD ELECTRICITY POLICY ARTICLES</title><summary type='text'>I strongly recommend these two articles if you want a good, thorough analysis of what's going on with electricity:This Wall Street Journal article by Rebecca Smith is a really thorough study. The main defects are transmission systems badly in need of improvement and a chaotic combination of regulated and deregulated markets. The unsteady regulatory situation, among other factors, inhibits the</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106124627505887268'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106124627505887268'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106124627505887268' title='GOOD ELECTRICITY POLICY ARTICLES'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106124569322155803</id><published>2003-08-18T17:28:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-18T17:28:13.250-05:00</updated><title type='text'>MONDAY AFTERNOON BLACKOUT COMMENTARY ROUNDUP: NYT and WSJ</title><summary type='text'>I was intending to comment on all of these commentaries, but some writing has come my way that has taken more time than I thought ... in any case, for your convenience and my own, a compendium of commentaries:Robert Kuttner from the New York Times Saturday: no great surprise, he blames deregulation for the blackout. This ill-placed blame ignores several things. First, it does not stand up to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106124569322155803'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106124569322155803'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106124569322155803' title='MONDAY AFTERNOON BLACKOUT COMMENTARY ROUNDUP: NYT and WSJ'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106122032058278145</id><published>2003-08-18T10:25:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-18T12:19:36.873-05:00</updated><title type='text'>THANKS FOR THE LINKS, MATES!</title><summary type='text'>I must take this opportunity to thank those of you who directed traffic this way: Tyler Cowen, Steve Verdon, and Megan McArdle aka Jane Galt all posted links to the Knowledge Problem, as well as offering their own cogent and insightful commentaries.Tyler also mentioned the Watts paper on cascading failures, and has endeared himself to me even further by calling me the "goddess of electricity </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106122032058278145'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106122032058278145'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106122032058278145' title='THANKS FOR THE LINKS, MATES!'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106121948350286752</id><published>2003-08-18T10:11:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-18T10:11:23.576-05:00</updated><title type='text'>SOME TECHNICAL REFERENCES</title><summary type='text'>For you techies out there, here's a paper by Duncan Watts on cascading failures from the Santa Fe Institute [ironically, I was reading this paper for my own general edification early last week!]. And a knowledgeable reader, Eric Krieg, sends this link to a paper on high-phase power. Eric saysBasically, you can pump more juice through a 6 phase power transmission line corridor than you can </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106121948350286752'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106121948350286752'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106121948350286752' title='SOME TECHNICAL REFERENCES'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106121855644177503</id><published>2003-08-18T09:55:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-18T09:55:56.340-05:00</updated><title type='text'>TECH CENTRAL STATION'S ELECTRICITY ARTICLES</title><summary type='text'>Tech Central Station has a couple of electricity articles this morning: one by Vaclav Smil on the fragmented nature of our grid and the consequences of that fragmentation, and one by me on how deregulation is not to blame and how retail demand response can make the grid more reliable.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106121855644177503'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106121855644177503'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106121855644177503' title='TECH CENTRAL STATION&apos;S ELECTRICITY ARTICLES'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106121809772732313</id><published>2003-08-18T09:48:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-18T09:49:50.850-05:00</updated><title type='text'>MONDAY MORNING BLACKOUT NEWS ROUNDUP</title><summary type='text'>Some articles on the possible causes and the fallout from the blackout:Overloaded power lines in northern Ohio may be to blame, although the utility that owns and operates the lines in question thinks that their imbalances were a symptom of a larger problem:Baird said FirstEnergy is evaluating information that shows there were "unusual electric conditions and disturbances" throughout the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106121809772732313'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106121809772732313'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106121809772732313' title='MONDAY MORNING BLACKOUT NEWS ROUNDUP'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106116327997654359</id><published>2003-08-17T18:22:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-17T18:34:40.033-05:00</updated><title type='text'>ELECTRICITY CONTENT COMING TOMORROW</title><summary type='text'>I'll have more analysis and commentary on electricity policy tomorrow, after I've rested and digested the weekend's news. Please come back then (or set your aggregator to my RSS feed)!</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106116327997654359'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106116327997654359'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106116327997654359' title='ELECTRICITY CONTENT COMING TOMORROW'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106116317926763798</id><published>2003-08-17T18:22:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-17T18:32:59.330-05:00</updated><title type='text'>A RECIPE FOR THE PERFECT CHICAGO SUMMER DAY</title><summary type='text'>Morning: the cat sticks her wet little nose into your eye socket to wake you up. Husband makes tea, french toast and turkey bacon while you work on some electricity blackout writing.Weather: high of 78F, low humidity, not even a wispy cloud in the sky.11:30-2:30: kayak in the 3-4 foot waves on Lake Michigan with some of your favorite people on the planet.3:30-4:30: walk from home out to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106116317926763798'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106116317926763798'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106116317926763798' title='A RECIPE FOR THE PERFECT CHICAGO SUMMER DAY'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106116269858459353</id><published>2003-08-17T16:21:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-18T08:40:05.063-05:00</updated><title type='text'>INAUGURATING A NEW LAPTOP</title><summary type='text'>This post is the first from my brandy-new Macintosh Powerbook G4 12" laptop. It's utterly zippy -- stylish, small, screamin' fast, plays my Pride &amp; Prejudice DVD and all of my tunes from my IPod beautifully.And I am grateful to my husband, whose technical virtuosity makes it possible for me to live in a cross-platform world (we run Windows, Mac, Linux and OpenBSD at home).</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106116269858459353'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106116269858459353'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106116269858459353' title='INAUGURATING A NEW LAPTOP'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106098877297234321</id><published>2003-08-15T18:06:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-15T18:19:11.696-05:00</updated><title type='text'>REASON BLACKOUT RESOURCE CENTER</title><summary type='text'>We have updated Reason's electricity pages to include a Reason blackout resource center. Transmission-related information will be provided here, updated regularly.One very valuable resource available on our site is Ken Silverstein's column on the blackout. Ken is a very incisive observer of electricity policy, and he correctly points out thatThe wires business must evolve to meet the needs of</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106098877297234321'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106098877297234321'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106098877297234321' title='REASON BLACKOUT RESOURCE CENTER'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106098805404257080</id><published>2003-08-15T17:54:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-15T17:54:10.806-05:00</updated><title type='text'>GRID RELIABILITY AND ROBUSTNESS</title><summary type='text'>A quick break ... this commentary on electricity grid vulnerability from November 2001 is still, or even more, relevant today, even though my focus in this commentary was terrorism. A teaser:While the Sept. 11 attacks disrupted communications and business operations on a massive scale, many businesses recovered their data quickly, and telecommunications companies restored service quickly, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106098805404257080'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106098805404257080'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106098805404257080' title='GRID RELIABILITY AND ROBUSTNESS'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106097268979762567</id><published>2003-08-15T13:38:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-15T13:38:08.946-05:00</updated><title type='text'>GO TO RPPI.ORG FOR MORE ELECTRIC GRID RELIABILITY INFORMATION</title><summary type='text'>I am completely snowed under with interviews and have not yet been able to compose my thoughts beyond the soundbites. In the interim, please visit Reason's website for links to our electricity work, including this commentary on network reliability in California.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106097268979762567'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106097268979762567'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106097268979762567' title='GO TO RPPI.ORG FOR MORE ELECTRIC GRID RELIABILITY INFORMATION'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106095969468882983</id><published>2003-08-15T10:01:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-15T10:24:36.206-05:00</updated><title type='text'>POWER OUTAGE NEWS ROUNDUP</title><summary type='text'>A good overall story from Reuters, and one from the New York Times.A Bloomberg Energy article pointing to the fact that the power outage meant that five refineries in Ohio, Michigan and Ontario have gone offline, so gasoline prices may be affected. But lots of gas stations are closed because their pumps run on electricity.This CBS Marketwatch story describes how New York City is getting back </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106095969468882983'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106095969468882983'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106095969468882983' title='POWER OUTAGE NEWS ROUNDUP'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106095259672248230</id><published>2003-08-15T08:03:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-15T08:16:21.440-05:00</updated><title type='text'>THIS POWER OUTAGE DID NOT COME OUT OF THE BLUE</title><summary type='text'>The grid has been the subject of underinvestment for the past decade, and lots of industry folks, industry analysts, and government officials have put their heads together to think about how to make the grid more robust for the 21st century. This Washington Post article puts it nicely:The country's halting moves toward electricity deregulation over the past decade have dramatically increased </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106095259672248230'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106095259672248230'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106095259672248230' title='THIS POWER OUTAGE DID NOT COME OUT OF THE BLUE'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106095168713487519</id><published>2003-08-15T07:48:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-15T07:52:48.673-05:00</updated><title type='text'>POWER OUTAGE MEDIA FRENZY</title><summary type='text'>I got bumped from Greta; between Governor Pataki and the fact that the New York phone lines were fading in and out.  Today it's lots of radio interviews, and I'll post some about what could cause such a thing, While I'm doing radio and trying to get a little sleep, Glenn has some further links, including MIT Energy Lab study link from Suman Palit. This study, from March 2000, is by Yong Yoon </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106095168713487519'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106095168713487519'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106095168713487519' title='POWER OUTAGE MEDIA FRENZY'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106090359253716994</id><published>2003-08-14T18:26:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-14T18:31:01.940-05:00</updated><title type='text'>POWER OUTAGE</title><summary type='text'>Glenn Reynolds has a post that gathers a lot of info about the northeast power outage. I've not been blogging it because I've been doing radio interviews.If you stay up late to watch Greta van Susteren on Fox News, and then a special report, you'll probably see me.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106090359253716994'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106090359253716994'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106090359253716994' title='POWER OUTAGE'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106086986707697990</id><published>2003-08-14T09:04:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-14T09:09:01.550-05:00</updated><title type='text'>RADLEY BALKO AND I ARE BOTH LISTENIN' ...</title><summary type='text'>To the same stuff, according to this post on the contemplative music he's listening to. Specifically, we overlap on Tom Waits (early and late for me, I like his "rough and ragged" recent voice), the Verve (I have always been a fan of British music, this is what happens when you come of age in the mid-80s), and Miles Davis.Actually, though, lately it's been lots and lots of Coldplay and Kurt </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106086986707697990'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106086986707697990'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106086986707697990' title='RADLEY BALKO AND I ARE BOTH LISTENIN&apos; ...'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106078271385412843</id><published>2003-08-13T08:51:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-13T08:56:41.440-05:00</updated><title type='text'>WELCOME NEW BABIES</title><summary type='text'>I'd like to welcome two new babies: Michael Brancato, son of Kevin Brancato and his wife, and Mateo Firth, son of Colin Firth and his wife Livia Giuggioli.Benvenuti!</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106078271385412843'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106078271385412843'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106078271385412843' title='WELCOME NEW BABIES'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106078087458078531</id><published>2003-08-13T08:21:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-13T08:28:10.893-05:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>In the same post, AtlanticBlog mentions Thomas Sowell on economic and demographic change in California. Sowell asks this question: After years -- indeed, generations -- of being a magnet for people and businesses, California is now exporting both, including particularly young people. Why?His hypothesis:One reason is that California's politicians are following a strategy which has worked </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106078087458078531'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106078087458078531'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106078087458078531' title=''/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106077886658514301</id><published>2003-08-13T07:47:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-13T07:52:34.786-05:00</updated><title type='text'>BASTIAT SHOULD BE REQUIRED READING</title><summary type='text'>I think Frederic Bastiat was one of the most insightful writers on state power.  He starts off his major work, The Law, with a bang in the introduction:If every person has the right to defend even by force—his person, his liberty, and his property, then it follows that a group of men have the right to organize and support a common force to protect these rights constantly. Thus the principle of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106077886658514301'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106077886658514301'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106077886658514301' title='BASTIAT SHOULD BE REQUIRED READING'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106077804524997188</id><published>2003-08-13T07:34:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-13T07:38:53.630-05:00</updated><title type='text'>PASCAL ON PROOF AND CUSTOM</title><summary type='text'>I've forgotten to check Eric Rasmusen's blog lately, and in revisiting there this morning I noticed his interesting post on Pascal, proof and custom. The passage he chose to quote, from Pensees, is striking, and not something that I've typically associated with Pascal:For we must not misunderstand ourselves; we are as much automatic as intellectual; and hence it comes that the instrument by </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106077804524997188'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106077804524997188'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106077804524997188' title='PASCAL ON PROOF AND CUSTOM'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106070072683293795</id><published>2003-08-12T10:05:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-12T10:05:26.813-05:00</updated><title type='text'>RAUCH ON SPAM</title><summary type='text'>Jonathan Rauch has a typically good column on spam and ways to deal with it. He recommends what I think is the best approach: that we have property rights in our email inbox!The spam problem, though new in form, is an instance of a very old and familiar dilemma, which economists often call the tragedy of the commons. When any resource is both valuable and freely available, people tend to </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106070072683293795'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106070072683293795'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106070072683293795' title='RAUCH ON SPAM'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3558354.post-106069806644445637</id><published>2003-08-12T09:21:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2003-08-12T09:21:06.546-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Link to RSS feed</title><summary type='text'>OK, for those of you who use aggregators, here's the address of my RSS feed:http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/rss/knowledgeproblem.xml</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106069806644445637'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3558354/posts/default/106069806644445637'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://knowledgeproblem.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106069806644445637' title='Link to RSS feed'/><author><name>lkkinetic</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
